Your Equation

Library / Heat transfer and thermal systems / HTS-04

Heat transfer and thermal systems

Plane-wall flux with linearly varying conductivity

Steady conduction through a wall whose conductivity varies as k = kref[1 + b(T − Tref)], using the conductivity at the mean of the two face temperatures.

Ref
HTS-04
Rev
v1
Field
Heat transfer and thermal systems
Result
q″ [W/m²]

If conductivity changes linearly with temperature, k = kref[1 + b(T − Tref)], the steady flux through a plane wall is the same as for constant conductivity evaluated at the mean of the two face temperatures. This exact result for a linear law makes it easy to correct a handbook flux for temperature. Conductivity must stay positive across the interval.

Steady conduction through a wall whose conductivity varies as k = kref[1 + b(T − Tref)], using the conductivity at the mean of the two face temperatures. Conductivity must stay positive across the temperature interval.

Calculator

Solve for
W/m²
W/(m K)
0.05500
1/K
00.003
K
200400
K
2001,000
K
2001,000
m
0.0011
  • Conductivity at the mean temperature2.2 W/(m K)
  • Flux if conductivity stayed at kref2,000 W/m²
  • Wall resistance per unit area, L/k0.04545 m² K/W

What drives the result

Each variable is moved across its typical range while the others stay at the values above. The longest bar is the key driver.

Heat flux (W/m²) current value 2,200 W/m²
krefReference conductivityKey driver
55550,000
LWall thickness
220220,000
T1Hot-face temperature
−1,80023,800
T2Cold-face temperature
−21,6004,000
TrefReference temperature
1,8002,600
bTemperature coefficient of conductivity
2,0002,300
  • The wall carries 2,200 W/m², against 2,000 W/m² if its conductivity were fixed at 2 W/(m K).
  • The difference of 10 % shows how much a temperature-dependent conductivity matters over a wide temperature span.
Chart data as tables

Ranked variables

VariableTypical rangeLowest resultHighest resultSwing (W/m²)Local stepChange in result
kref Reference conductivity0.05 to 500 W/(m K)55550,000549,900+10%+10 %
L Wall thickness0.001 to 1 m220220,000219,800+10%−9.09 %
T1 Hot-face temperature200 to 1,000 K−1,80023,80025,600+10%+45.1 %
T2 Cold-face temperature200 to 1,000 K−21,6004,00025,600+10%−28.1 %
Tref Reference temperature200 to 400 K1,8002,600800+10%−5.45 %
b Temperature coefficient of conductivity0 to 0.003 1/K2,0002,300300+10%+0.909 %

Sweep of Temperature coefficient of conductivity

Temperature coefficient of conductivity (1/K)Heat flux (W/m²)
02,000
3.75e-42,038
7.5e-42,075
0.0011252,112
0.00152,150
0.0018752,188
0.002252,225
0.0026252,263
0.0032,300

Sweep one variable

Heat flux (W/m²)Hover, touch, or use the arrow keys on the chart
2000205021002150220022502300 05e−40.0010.00150.0020.00250.003 Temperature coefficient of conductivity (1/K) now 2,200

Variables and how each one contributes

q″

Heat flux

Result · W/m²

What the equation gives you. Everything else feeds it.

kref

Reference conductivity

W/(m K) · typical 0.05 to 500

The conductivity at the reference temperature, in W/(m K). Raises the flux in direct proportion. Raising it by 10 % (to 2.2) moves the result by +10 %, from 2,200 to 2,420 W/m².

b

Temperature coefficient of conductivity

1/K · typical 0 to 0.003

The temperature coefficient of conductivity, in 1/K. A larger positive coefficient raises the mean conductivity and hence the flux. Raising it by 10 % (to 0.0022) moves the result by +0.909 %, from 2,200 to 2,220 W/m².

Tref

Reference temperature

K · typical 200 to 400

The reference temperature of kref, in K. A higher reference temperature lowers the mean temperature above it, so the flux falls when b is positive. Raising it by 10 % (to 330) moves the result by −5.45 %, from 2,200 to 2,080 W/m².

T1

Hot-face temperature

K · typical 200 to 1,000

The hot-face temperature, in K. Raises the flux through both the temperature difference and the mean conductivity. Raising it by 10 % (to 440) moves the result by +45.1 %, from 2,200 to 3,192 W/m².

T2

Cold-face temperature

K · typical 200 to 1,000

The cold-face temperature, in K. Raises the mean conductivity but lowers the temperature difference. Raising it by 10 % (to 330) moves the result by −28.1 %, from 2,200 to 1,582 W/m².

L

Wall thickness

m · typical 0.001 to 1

The wall thickness, in m. A thicker wall lowers the flux in inverse proportion. Raising it by 10 % (to 0.11) moves the result by −9.09 %, from 2,200 to 2,000 W/m².

Worked example with the values above

  1. Mean temperature: (400 + 300)/2 = 350 K; k = 2 × (1 + 0.002 × 50) = 2.2 W/(m K).
  2. Temperature gradient: (T₁ − T₂)/L = 1,000 K/m.
  3. q″ = 2.2 × 1,000 = 2,200 W/m².

Assumptions and limits

  • Steady state, constant properties unless the page states a temperature law, and no internal heat generation.
  • One-dimensional conduction in the stated geometry, with no edge or end losses.

Common mistakes

  • Using diameters where radii are needed.
  • Using °C in a formula that needs an absolute temperature, or leaving a temperature difference out of the heat rate.
  • Applying a plane-wall formula to a curved wall when the thickness is not small compared with the radius.

Statistics and uncertainty

Thermal conductivities are rarely known better than 5 % to 10 %, and contact resistances can vary by a factor of two between nominally identical joints. Treat results as estimates unless the inputs were measured.

Where it is used

  • Insulation sizing for vessels, pipes and walls.
  • Estimating interface and layer temperatures in composite constructions.

Maths you need

  • Fourier’s law: q″ = −k dT/dx
  • Thermal resistance: R = ΔT/Q, in K/W
  • Series and parallel paths: resistances add in series; conductances add in parallel

Related formulas

Practise this formula