Your Equation

Library / Heat transfer and thermal systems / HTS-03

Heat transfer and thermal systems

Effective conductivity of parallel paths

Equivalent conductivity of up to three parallel conduction paths of the same thickness that share isothermal end faces, weighted by cross-sectional area.

Ref
HTS-03
Rev
v1
Field
Heat transfer and thermal systems
Result
k [W/(m K)]

When several materials sit side by side, spanning the same thickness between isothermal end faces, their conductances add. The equivalent conductivity is the area-weighted average, k = ΣkᵢAᵢ/ΣAᵢ. It is an upper bound for real composites because it ignores heat spreading sideways between paths. Set an unused path to zero area.

Equivalent conductivity of up to three parallel conduction paths of the same thickness that share isothermal end faces, weighted by cross-sectional area. Leave an unused path at zero area.

Calculator

Solve for
W/(m K)
W/(m K)
0.01500
m²
0.0110
W/(m K)
0.01500
m²
0.0110
W/(m K)
0.01500
m²
010
  • Total area, ΣA1 m²
  • Weighted sum, ΣkA0.65 W m/K
  • Area share of path 10.75

What drives the result

Each variable is moved across its typical range while the others stay at the values above. The longest bar is the key driver.

Effective conductivity (W/(m K)) current value 0.65 W/(m K)
k1Conductivity of path 1Key driver
0.507376
k2Conductivity of path 2
0.153125
A1Area of path 1
0.2441.93
A2Area of path 2
0.2241.87
A3Area of path 3
0.968
k3Conductivity of path 3 (unused if A₃ = 0)
  • The parallel paths behave like a single material of 0.65 W/(m K), with 75 % of the area in the first path.
  • The highly conducting path dominates: it carries a share of the heat larger than its area share, as heat avoids the poor conductor.
Chart data as tables

Ranked variables

VariableTypical rangeLowest resultHighest resultSwing (W/(m K))Local stepChange in result
k1 Conductivity of path 10.01 to 500 W/(m K)0.5075375.5375+10%+2.31 %
k2 Conductivity of path 20.01 to 500 W/(m K)0.1525125.2125+10%+7.69 %
A1 Area of path 10.01 to 10 m²0.24391.9311.687+10%−4.83 %
A2 Area of path 20.01 to 10 m²0.22371.8741.651+10%+5.07 %
A3 Area of path 30 to 10 m²0.650.96820.3182+10%0 %
k3 Conductivity of path 3 (unused if A₃ = 0)0.01 to 500 W/(m K)0.650.650+10%0 %

Sweep of Area of path 2

Area of path 2 (m²)Effective conductivity (W/(m K))
0.010.2237
0.023710.2552
0.056230.3255
0.13340.4717
0.31620.7339
0.74991.1
1.7781.466
4.2171.728
101.874

Sweep one variable

Effective conductivity (W/(m K))Hover, touch, or use the arrow keys on the chart
0.511.52 0.010.050.215 Area of path 2 (m²), log scale now 0.65

Variables and how each one contributes

k

Effective conductivity

Result · W/(m K)

What the equation gives you. Everything else feeds it.

k1

Conductivity of path 1

W/(m K) · typical 0.01 to 500

The conductivity of path 1, in W/(m K). Raises the effective conductivity in proportion to its area share. Raising it by 10 % (to 0.22) moves the result by +2.31 %, from 0.65 to 0.665 W/(m K).

A1

Area of path 1

m² · typical 0.01 to 10

The cross-sectional area of path 1, in m². A larger area gives this path more weight in the average. Raising it by 10 % (to 0.825) moves the result by −4.83 %, from 0.65 to 0.6186 W/(m K).

k2

Conductivity of path 2

W/(m K) · typical 0.01 to 500

The conductivity of path 2, in W/(m K). Raises the effective conductivity in proportion to its area share. Raising it by 10 % (to 2.2) moves the result by +7.69 %, from 0.65 to 0.7 W/(m K).

A2

Area of path 2

m² · typical 0.01 to 10

The cross-sectional area of path 2, in m². A larger area gives this path more weight in the average. Raising it by 10 % (to 0.275) moves the result by +5.07 %, from 0.65 to 0.6829 W/(m K).

k3

Conductivity of path 3 (unused if A₃ = 0)

W/(m K) · typical 0.01 to 500

The conductivity of path 3, in W/(m K). Matters only if its area is not zero. Raising it by 10 % (to 1.1) moves the result by +0 %, from 0.65 to 0.65 W/(m K).

A3

Area of path 3

m² · typical 0 to 10

The area of path 3, in m² (zero if unused). Adds weight to path 3 as the area grows. Raising it by 10 % (to 0) moves the result by +0 %, from 0.65 to 0.65 W/(m K).

Worked example with the values above

  1. Weighted terms: k₁A₁ = 0.15, k₂A₂ = 0.5, k₃A₃ = 0; sum = 0.65.
  2. Total area: 0.75 + 0.25 + 0 = 1 m².
  3. k = 0.65 / 1 = 0.65 W/(m K).

Assumptions and limits

  • Steady state, constant properties unless the page states a temperature law, and no internal heat generation.
  • One-dimensional conduction in the stated geometry, with no edge or end losses.

Common mistakes

  • Using diameters where radii are needed.
  • Using °C in a formula that needs an absolute temperature, or leaving a temperature difference out of the heat rate.
  • Applying a plane-wall formula to a curved wall when the thickness is not small compared with the radius.

Statistics and uncertainty

Thermal conductivities are rarely known better than 5 % to 10 %, and contact resistances can vary by a factor of two between nominally identical joints. Treat results as estimates unless the inputs were measured.

Where it is used

  • Insulation sizing for vessels, pipes and walls.
  • Estimating interface and layer temperatures in composite constructions.

Maths you need

  • Fourier’s law: q″ = −k dT/dx
  • Thermal resistance: R = ΔT/Q, in K/W
  • Series and parallel paths: resistances add in series; conductances add in parallel

Related formulas

Practise this formula