Your Equation

Library / Structural dynamics and vibration testing / SDY-05

Structural dynamics and vibration testing

Damping from half-power frequencies

Damping ratio of a lightly damped, well-separated resonance from the width of its peak at the half-power points, where the magnitude has fallen to 1/√2 of the peak.

Ref
SDY-05
Rev
v1
Field
Structural dynamics and vibration testing
Result
ζ

For a lightly damped, well-separated resonance the width of the receptance peak between the half-power points, where the magnitude is 1/√2 of the peak, is about 2ζfₙ. So ζ ≈ (f₂ − f₁)/(2fₙ). The frequency resolution must be fine enough to resolve the width, and the method fails if neighbouring modes overlap.

Damping ratio of a lightly damped, well-separated resonance from the width of its peak at the half-power points, where the magnitude has fallen to 1/√2 of the peak.

Calculator

Solve for
Hz
4050.9
Hz
49.160
Hz
10200
  • Bandwidth, f₂ − f₁2 Hz
  • Quality factor, 1/(2ζ)25
  • Resolution needed for about ten points across the bandwidth0.2 Hz

What drives the result

Each variable is moved across its typical range while the others stay at the values above. The longest bar is the key driver.

Damping ratio () current value 0.02
f1Lower half-power frequencyKey driver
0.0010.11
f2Upper half-power frequency
0.0010.11
fnUndamped frequency estimate
0.0050.1
  • A peak 2 Hz wide at 50 Hz gives a damping ratio of 0.02 and a quality factor of 25.
  • Unless the bins are much finer than 2 Hz, the half-power points cannot be located and the estimate is biased.
Chart data as tables

Ranked variables

VariableTypical rangeLowest resultHighest resultSwing ()Local stepChange in result
f1 Lower half-power frequency40 to 50.9 Hz0.0010.110.109+10%—
f2 Upper half-power frequency49.1 to 60 Hz0.0010.110.109+10%+255 %
fn Undamped frequency estimate10 to 200 Hz0.0050.10.095+10%−9.09 %

Sweep of Upper half-power frequency

Upper half-power frequency (Hz)Damping ratio
49.10.001
50.460.01462
51.830.02825
53.190.04188
54.550.0555
55.910.06913
57.270.08275
58.640.09638
600.11

Sweep one variable

Damping ratio ()Hover, touch, or use the arrow keys on the chart
00.020.040.060.080.1 505254565860 Upper half-power frequency (Hz) now 0.02

Variables and how each one contributes

ζ

Damping ratio

Result ·

What the equation gives you. Everything else feeds it.

f1

Lower half-power frequency

Hz · typical 40 to 50.9

The frequency below the peak, in Hz, where the response magnitude has fallen to 70.7 % of the peak. Lowering f₁ widens the peak and raises the damping estimate. Raising it by 10 % (to 53.9) gives no valid result at the other default values.

f2

Upper half-power frequency

Hz · typical 49.1 to 60

The frequency above the peak, in Hz, where the response magnitude has fallen to 70.7 % of the peak. Raising f₂ widens the peak and raises the damping estimate. Raising it by 10 % (to 56.1) moves the result by +255 %, from 0.02 to 0.071.

fn

Undamped frequency estimate

Hz · typical 10 to 200

The undamped natural frequency of the mode, in Hz, usually taken as the peak frequency. A higher centre frequency for the same bandwidth means less relative damping. Raising it by 10 % (to 55) moves the result by −9.09 %, from 0.02 to 0.01818.

Worked example with the values above

  1. Bandwidth: f₂ − f₁ = 51 − 49 = 2 Hz.
  2. Twice the centre frequency: 2fₙ = 100 Hz.
  3. ζ = 2 / 100 = 0.02.

Assumptions and limits

  • A single, well-separated mode dominates the record and the damping is viscous (proportional to velocity) and light.
  • Peaks or half-power points are read from clean data with enough resolution.

Common mistakes

  • Mixing peak heights with peak-to-peak values, or taking peaks from opposite sides of the zero line.
  • Using a record that contains several modes, so the envelope is not a single exponential.
  • Using the half-power width when the frequency resolution is too coarse to resolve it.
  • Using an angular frequency in rad/s where Hz is expected, or the reverse.

Statistics and uncertainty

Decrements read from only one pair of peaks carry the reading error of both. Averaging over several cycles, or fitting an exponential to the whole envelope, cuts the scatter. Damping is itself an inexact, amplitude-dependent property, so quote the amplitude at which it was measured.

Where it is used

  • Identifying damping from an impact or ring-down test on a structure, instrument or component.
  • Setting the damping values used in finite-element and modal models.

Maths you need

  • Natural logarithm: the inverse of e to a power
  • Damping ratio: damping as a fraction of critical
  • Free decay: the envelope of an unforced vibration

Related formulas

Practise this formula