Your Equation

Library / Hydraulics, open channels and fluid power / HYD-08

Hydraulics, open channels and fluid power

Kinetic-energy correction factor from sampled velocities

Kinetic-energy correction factor for a profile described by two subareas with representative velocities.

Ref
HYD-08
Rev
v1
Field
Hydraulics, open channels and fluid power
Result
α

When the velocity across a pipe is not uniform, the true kinetic energy flow exceeds that of the mean velocity by the factor α = Σ(Aᵢuᵢ³)/(A U³), with the mean U = Σ(Aᵢuᵢ)/A. A uniform profile gives α = 1, and fully developed laminar pipe flow gives 2. This calculator uses two subareas, so set one subarea to a small value to approximate a single area.

Kinetic-energy correction factor for a profile described by two subareas with representative velocities. The mean velocity U is the area-weighted mean, so a uniform profile gives 1 and a laminar pipe profile gives 2.

Calculator

Solve for
m²
0.001100
m²
0.001100
m/s
0.0150
m/s
0.0150
  • Area-weighted mean velocity, U2 m/s
  • Total area2 m²
  • Momentum correction factor, Σ Aᵢuᵢ²/(A U²)1.25

What drives the result

Each variable is moved across its typical range while the others stay at the values above. The longest bar is the key driver.

Kinetic-energy correction factor () current value 1.75
u1Representative velocity in subarea 1Key driver
13.96
u2Representative velocity in subarea 2
13.88
A1Subarea 1
12.26
A2Subarea 2
1.012.26
  • With velocities of 1 and 3 m/s over equal parts, the mean is 2 m/s and the kinetic energy is 1.75 times that of the mean velocity.
  • The more uneven the profile, the larger α: equal velocities would give exactly 1.
Chart data as tables

Ranked variables

VariableTypical rangeLowest resultHighest resultSwing ()Local stepChange in result
u1 Representative velocity in subarea 10.01 to 50 m/s13.962.96+10%−6.04 %
u2 Representative velocity in subarea 20.01 to 50 m/s1.0033.8822.879+10%+6.19 %
A1 Subarea 10.001 to 100 m²1.0012.2571.256+10%+2.74 %
A2 Subarea 20.001 to 100 m²1.012.2571.247+10%−2.7 %

Sweep of Representative velocity in subarea 2

Representative velocity in subarea 2 (m/s)Kinetic-energy correction factor
0.013.882
0.0293.671
0.084093.141
0.24382.109
0.70711.088
2.051.356
5.9462.521
17.243.378
503.769

Sweep one variable

Kinetic-energy correction factor ()Hover, touch, or use the arrow keys on the chart
11.522.533.54 0.010.1110 Representative velocity in subarea 2 (m/s), log scale now 1.75

Variables and how each one contributes

α

Kinetic-energy correction factor

Result ·

What the equation gives you. Everything else feeds it.

A1

Subarea 1

m² · typical 0.001 to 100

The area of subarea 1, in m². A larger first area gives it more weight in the mean and in the cubic sum. Raising it by 10 % (to 1.1) moves the result by +2.74 %, from 1.75 to 1.798.

A2

Subarea 2

m² · typical 0.001 to 100

The area of subarea 2, in m². A larger second area gives it more weight in the mean and in the cubic sum. Raising it by 10 % (to 1.1) moves the result by −2.7 %, from 1.75 to 1.703.

u1

Representative velocity in subarea 1

m/s · typical 0.01 to 50

The representative velocity in subarea 1, in m/s. A larger u₁ raises the spread of velocities, so α changes. Raising it by 10 % (to 1.1) moves the result by −6.04 %, from 1.75 to 1.644.

u2

Representative velocity in subarea 2

m/s · typical 0.01 to 50

The representative velocity in subarea 2, in m/s. A larger u₂ changes the spread of velocities, so α changes. Raising it by 10 % (to 3.3) moves the result by +6.19 %, from 1.75 to 1.858.

Worked example with the values above

  1. Mean velocity: (1 × 1 + 1 × 3) / 2 = 2 m/s.
  2. Cubic sum: Σ Aᵢuᵢ³ = 28; A U³ = 16.
  3. α = 1.75.

Assumptions and limits

  • Steady, fully developed laminar flow of a Newtonian liquid with no slip at the walls.
  • Smooth, straight geometry, and no body force other than gravity where stated.

Common mistakes

  • Using the plain average of the velocities in place of the area-weighted mean.
  • Using zero-area subareas.
  • Using the velocity at the centre as the mean velocity.

Statistics and uncertainty

These laminar formulas are exact for their model, so the uncertainty comes from the inputs. Gap and film thickness enter with the third power, so a 1 % error in thickness gives about a 3 % error in flow.

Where it is used

  • Lubrication films, coating, sealing gaps and thin-film runoff.
  • Checking viscous pipe flow and wall shear from measured pressure drops.

Maths you need

  • Viscosity: μ, the shear stress per unit velocity gradient
  • No-slip condition: the liquid moves with the wall at the wall
  • Reynolds number: the ratio of inertial to viscous forces

Related formulas

Practise this formula