Your Equation

Library / Automotive and vehicle dynamics / VEH-48

Automotive and vehicle dynamics

Steady CG sideslip in a linear bicycle model

Body sideslip angle at the centre of gravity in a steady turn of signed path radius R at speed U, for a linear bicycle model with rear cornering stiffness Cr.

Ref
VEH-48
Rev
v1
Field
Automotive and vehicle dynamics
Result
β [rad]

In a steady turn of radius R at speed U, a linear bicycle model with rear cornering stiffness Cr has the rear axle force m·U²·a/(L·R) = Cr·αr. The rear-axle velocity direction then gives the body sideslip β ≈ b/R + αr·(sign), which reduces to β ≈ b/R − m a U²/(L Cr R). At low speed the vehicle sideslip is b/R, set by geometry alone, and it falls and crosses zero as speed rises.

Body sideslip angle at the centre of gravity in a steady turn of signed path radius R at speed U, for a linear bicycle model with rear cornering stiffness Cr. Small angles, no rear steer. Positive β means the velocity points left of the heading.

Calculator

Solve for
rad
m
0.25
m
51,000
kg
10050,000
m
0.25
m/s
060
N/rad
5,0001,000,000
  • Kinematic (geometric) term, b/R0.036 rad
  • Dynamic term, m a U²/(L Cr R)0.045 rad
  • Speed at which the sideslip is zero, √(b L Cr/(m a))13.42 m/s

What drives the result

Each variable is moved across its typical range while the others stay at the values above. The longest bar is the key driver.

CG sideslip angle (rad) current value −0.009 rad
mVehicle massKey driver
−1.460.033
UForward speed
−0.6840.036
CrRear axle cornering stiffness
−0.5040.0333
bCG to rear axle
−0.09240.0782
RPath radius (signed)
−0.09−4.5e-4
aCG to front axle
−0.04670.0248
  • The sideslip is −0.009 rad (−0.516°), so the vehicle nose points inside its path at this speed.
  • The sideslip is zero at 13.42 m/s; the default speed is above that.
Chart data as tables

Ranked variables

VariableTypical rangeLowest resultHighest resultSwing (rad)Local stepChange in result
m Vehicle mass100 to 50,000 kg−1.4640.0331.497+10%+50 %
U Forward speed0 to 60 m/s−0.6840.0360.72+10%+105 %
Cr Rear axle cornering stiffness5,000 to 1,000,000 N/rad−0.5040.03330.5373+10%−45.5 %
b CG to rear axle0.2 to 5 m−0.092430.078230.1707+10%−68.3 %
R Path radius (signed)5 to 1,000 m−0.09−4.5e-40.08955+10%−9.09 %
a CG to front axle0.2 to 5 m−0.046720.024750.07147+10%+28.8 %

Sweep of Forward speed

Forward speed (m/s)CG sideslip angle (rad)
00.036
7.50.02475
15−0.009
22.5−0.06525
30−0.144
37.5−0.2452
45−0.369
52.5−0.5152
60−0.684

Sweep one variable

CG sideslip angle (rad)Hover, touch, or use the arrow keys on the chart
−0.6−0.4−0.2−6e−17 0102030405060 Forward speed (m/s) now −0.009

Variables and how each one contributes

β

CG sideslip angle

Result · rad

What the equation gives you. Everything else feeds it.

b

CG to rear axle

m · typical 0.2 to 5

The distance from the centre of gravity to the rear axle, in m. Raises the low-speed sideslip b/R in direct proportion. Raising it by 10 % (to 1.98) moves the result by −68.3 %, from −0.009 to −0.002853 rad.

R

Path radius (signed)

m · typical 5 to 1,000

The path radius, in m. A bigger radius lowers both terms, so the sideslip magnitude falls in inverse proportion. Raising it by 10 % (to 55) moves the result by −9.09 %, from −0.009 to −0.008182 rad.

m

Vehicle mass

kg · typical 100 to 50,000

The vehicle mass, in kg. Raises the dynamic term and drives the sideslip more negative. Raising it by 10 % (to 1,650) moves the result by +50 %, from −0.009 to −0.0135 rad.

a

CG to front axle

m · typical 0.2 to 5

The distance from the centre of gravity to the front axle, in m. Raises the dynamic term, since a larger share of the lateral force is at the rear. Raising it by 10 % (to 1.32) moves the result by +28.8 %, from −0.009 to −0.0116 rad.

U

Forward speed

m/s · typical 0 to 60

The forward speed, in m/s. Raises the dynamic term with U², so the sideslip changes sign above a particular speed. Raising it by 10 % (to 16.5) moves the result by +105 %, from −0.009 to −0.01845 rad.

Cr

Rear axle cornering stiffness

N/rad · typical 5,000 to 1,000,000

The rear-axle cornering stiffness, in N/rad. A stiffer rear axle needs less slip angle and so lowers the dynamic term. Raising it by 10 % (to 66,000) moves the result by −45.5 %, from −0.009 to −0.004909 rad.

Worked example with the values above

  1. Geometric term: b/R = 1.8 / 50 = 0.036 rad.
  2. Dynamic term: m a U²/(L Cr R) = 1,500 × 1.2 × 225 / (3 × 60,000 × 50) = 0.045 rad.
  3. β = 0.036 − 0.045 = −0.009 rad.

Assumptions and limits

  • A rigid vehicle on a flat road in steady or slowly varying motion, small angles and a linear single-track (bicycle) model where stated.
  • Level road, no aerodynamic yaw moment and no roll effects on the axle forces unless the page says so.

Common mistakes

  • Entering the path radius without its sign.
  • Using the front cornering stiffness in place of the rear one.
  • Applying the small-angle bicycle model at high lateral acceleration, where tyre saturation breaks it.

Statistics and uncertainty

Yaw inertia and cornering stiffness are usually known to 10 % to 20 %, and steady sideslip is the small difference of two similar terms, so it is more sensitive to errors than either term alone.

Where it is used

  • Splitting cornering force between axles and checking handling balance.
  • Yaw-control and torque-vectoring design, and banked test-track layout.

Maths you need

  • Newton’s second law: F = ma, for force and for moment
  • Single-track model: two tyres lumped as one per axle
  • Centripetal acceleration: a = U²/R

Related formulas

Practise this formula