Your Equation

Library / Structural dynamics and vibration testing / SDY-39

Structural dynamics and vibration testing

Rayleigh mass coefficient from two target frequencies

Mass-proportional Rayleigh coefficient α that gives chosen damping ratios at two chosen frequencies.

Ref
SDY-39
Rev
v1
Field
Structural dynamics and vibration testing
Result
α [1/s]

Requiring Rayleigh damping to give ζ₁ at ω₁ and ζ₂ at ω₂ leads to two linear equations in α and β. The mass coefficient is α = 2ω₁ω₂(ζ₁ω₂ − ζ₂ω₁)/(ω₂² − ω₁²). If the two target ratios are equal, α = 2ζω₁ω₂/(ω₁ + ω₂). The target frequencies must be distinct and positive.

Mass-proportional Rayleigh coefficient α that gives chosen damping ratios at two chosen frequencies. It is the first row of the two-frequency calibration.

Calculator

Solve for
1/s
rad/s
235
0.0050.2
rad/s
15200
0.0050.2
  • Stiffness coefficient β0.002 s
  • Damping at the geometric mean of the targets0.04
  • Frequency of minimum damping, √(α/β)20 rad/s

What drives the result

Each variable is moved across its typical range while the others stay at the values above. The longest bar is the key driver.

Mass coefficient (1/s) current value 0.8 1/s
ζ1Damping ratio at ω₁Key driver
−0.164
ω1Lower target angular frequency
0.191.87
ζ2Damping ratio at ω₂
01.04
ω2Upper target angular frequency
0.60.952
  • Targets of 5 % at 10 rad/s and 5 % at 40 rad/s give α = 0.8 1/s.
  • With equal targets the damping falls below them between the two frequencies, to 4 % at the geometric mean.
Chart data as tables

Ranked variables

VariableTypical rangeLowest resultHighest resultSwing (1/s)Local stepChange in result
ζ1 Damping ratio at ω₁0.005 to 0.2 −0.1644.16+10%+13.3 %
ω1 Lower target angular frequency2 to 35 rad/s0.19051.8671.676+10%+7.84 %
ζ2 Damping ratio at ω₂0.005 to 0.2 01.041.04+10%−3.33 %
ω2 Upper target angular frequency15 to 200 rad/s0.60.95240.3524+10%+1.85 %

Sweep of Damping ratio at ω₁

Damping ratio at ω₁Mass coefficient (1/s)
0.005−0.16
0.029380.36
0.053750.88
0.078131.4
0.10251.92
0.12692.44
0.15122.96
0.17563.48
0.24

Sweep one variable

Mass coefficient (1/s)Hover, touch, or use the arrow keys on the chart
01234 0.050.10.150.2 Damping ratio at ω₁ now 0.8

Variables and how each one contributes

α

Mass coefficient

Result · 1/s

What the equation gives you. Everything else feeds it.

ω1

Lower target angular frequency

rad/s · typical 2 to 35

The lower target angular frequency, in rad/s. Changes where the damping is pinned down. Raising it by 10 % (to 11) moves the result by +7.84 %, from 0.8 to 0.8627 1/s.

ζ1

Damping ratio at ω₁

· typical 0.005 to 0.2

The target damping ratio at the lower frequency. Raises the coefficient that sets the low-frequency damping. Raising it by 10 % (to 0.055) moves the result by +13.3 %, from 0.8 to 0.9067 1/s.

ω2

Upper target angular frequency

rad/s · typical 15 to 200

The upper target angular frequency, in rad/s. It must be larger than the lower one. Changes where the damping is pinned down. Raising it by 10 % (to 44) moves the result by +1.85 %, from 0.8 to 0.8148 1/s.

ζ2

Damping ratio at ω₂

· typical 0.005 to 0.2

The target damping ratio at the upper frequency. Raises the coefficient that sets the high-frequency damping. Raising it by 10 % (to 0.055) moves the result by −3.33 %, from 0.8 to 0.7733 1/s.

Worked example with the values above

  1. Numerator: 2ω₁ω₂(ζ₁ω₂ − ζ₂ω₁) = 2 × 10 × 40 × (1.5) = 1,200.
  2. Denominator: ω₂² − ω₁² = 1,500.
  3. α = 0.8 1/s.

Assumptions and limits

  • Classical damping in the form C = αM + βK, with α and β constant.
  • The two target frequencies are distinct and positive, and the damping between them is accepted to dip below the targets.

Common mistakes

  • Assuming Rayleigh damping holds the target ratio across the band: it dips between the two targets and rises sharply outside them.
  • Mixing α in 1/s with a frequency in Hz.
  • Choosing target frequencies that do not bracket the modes that matter.

Statistics and uncertainty

The calibration is exact for the two chosen points, but the damping in between and outside them is a model result and not a measurement. Check it against measured modal damping across the band.

Where it is used

  • Setting damping in transient and modal finite-element analyses from two measured damping ratios.
  • Checking the predicted damping of every mode in a band after calibration.

Maths you need

  • Damping matrix: C in M ü + C u̇ + K u = F
  • Modal damping ratio: damping of a single mode as a fraction of critical

Related formulas

Practise this formula