Your Equation

Library / Terramechanics and off-road mobility / TER-39

Terramechanics and off-road mobility

Mohr–Coulomb parameters from two shear tests

Cohesion c, and (in the derived rows) friction angle φ in degrees, from two shear-strength tests at different effective normal stresses σ₁ and σ₂, using the same stress and drainage basis for both.

Ref
TER-39
Rev
v1
Field
Terramechanics and off-road mobility
Result
c [Pa]

Two shear-strength tests at different normal stresses fix a straight Mohr–Coulomb envelope τ = c + σ tan φ. The slope between them gives tan φ = (τ₂ − τ₁)/(σ₂ − σ₁), and the intercept is c = τ₁ − σ₁ tan φ. A negative c means the envelope extrapolates to a negative strength at zero stress, which usually shows scatter or a curved envelope rather than a real property.

Cohesion c, and (in the derived rows) friction angle φ in degrees, from two shear-strength tests at different effective normal stresses σ₁ and σ₂, using the same stress and drainage basis for both. Two points cannot show the fit uncertainty.

Calculator

Solve for
Pa
Pa
1,00020,000
Pa
30,000200,000
Pa
100100,000
Pa
100100,000
  • Friction angle, arctan((τ₂ − τ₁)/(σ₂ − σ₁))26.57 °
  • Slope of the envelope, tan φ0.5
  • Strength at 50 kPa normal stress, c + 50 000 tan φ28,000 Pa

What drives the result

Each variable is moved across its typical range while the others stay at the values above. The longest bar is the key driver.

Cohesion (Pa) current value 3,000 Pa
τ1Shear strength, test 1Key driver
−8,850141,000
τ2Shear strength, test 2
−38,00012,000
σ1Normal stress, test 1
−12,0007,660
σ2Normal stress, test 2
7,470
  • The envelope has a friction angle of 26.57° and a cohesion of 3,000 Pa.
  • At a 50 kPa normal stress it predicts a strength of 28,000 Pa, but use it only inside the stress range tested, between 10,000 and 30,000 Pa.
Chart data as tables

Ranked variables

VariableTypical rangeLowest resultHighest resultSwing (Pa)Local stepChange in result
τ1 Shear strength, test 1100 to 100,000 Pa−8,850141,000149,900+10%+40 %
τ2 Shear strength, test 2100 to 100,000 Pa−38,00011,95049,950+10%−30 %
σ1 Normal stress, test 11,000 to 20,000 Pa−12,0007,65519,660+10%−26.3 %
σ2 Normal stress, test 230,000 to 200,000 Pa3,0007,4744,474+10%+21.7 %

Sweep of Shear strength, test 2

Shear strength, test 2 (Pa)Cohesion (Pa)
10011,950
237.111,880
562.311,720
1,33411,330
3,16210,420
7,4998,251
17,7803,109
42,170−9,085
100,000−38,000

Sweep one variable

Cohesion (Pa)Hover, touch, or use the arrow keys on the chart
−40k−30k−20k−10k010k 100500200010k50k Shear strength, test 2 (Pa), log scale now 3,000

Variables and how each one contributes

c

Cohesion

Result · Pa

What the equation gives you. Everything else feeds it.

σ1

Normal stress, test 1

Pa · typical 1,000 to 20,000

The normal stress of test 1, in Pa. Raising it moves the intercept point and lowers c for a given slope. Raising it by 10 % (to 11,000) moves the result by −26.3 %, from 3,000 to 2,211 Pa.

σ2

Normal stress, test 2

Pa · typical 30,000 to 200,000

The normal stress of test 2, in Pa. A wider stress separation makes the slope better conditioned. Raising it by 10 % (to 33,000) moves the result by +21.7 %, from 3,000 to 3,652 Pa.

τ1

Shear strength, test 1

Pa · typical 100 to 100,000

The shear strength of test 1, in Pa. Raises the intercept c directly and lowers the slope. Raising it by 10 % (to 8,800) moves the result by +40 %, from 3,000 to 4,200 Pa.

τ2

Shear strength, test 2

Pa · typical 100 to 100,000

The shear strength of test 2, in Pa. Raises the slope and so lowers the intercept. Raising it by 10 % (to 19,800) moves the result by −30 %, from 3,000 to 2,100 Pa.

Worked example with the values above

  1. Slope: tan φ = (18,000 − 8,000) / (30,000 − 10,000) = 0.5, so φ = 26.565°.
  2. Slope term at test 1: σ₁ tan φ = 10,000 × 0.5 = 5,000 Pa.
  3. c = τ₁ − σ₁ tan φ = 8,000 − 5,000 = 3,000 Pa.

Assumptions and limits

  • The same soil state, plate or ring geometry and loading rate for each point.
  • A power-law pressure–sinkage law, a monotonic exponential shear curve and a linear Mohr–Coulomb envelope in the tested range.

Common mistakes

  • Mixing plate widths, or using width where the radius is needed.
  • Using test points from different soil states or different loading branches.
  • Using a shear point at or beyond the plateau, where the deformation length cannot be found.

Statistics and uncertainty

Soil strength and stiffness parameters from two-point methods carry the full measurement scatter of two points, which is typically 10 % to 30 %, and give no estimate of the fit uncertainty. Use a least-squares fit when more tests are available.

Where it is used

  • Fitting Bekker and Janosi shear parameters from bevameter and ring-shear tests.
  • Getting first-estimate strength parameters from a pair of simple field tests.

Maths you need

  • Bekker relation: p = (kc/b + kφ) zⁿ
  • Janosi–Hanamoto curve: τ = τmax(1 − e^(−j/K))
  • Mohr–Coulomb strength: τ = c + σ tan φ

Related formulas

Practise this formula