Your Equation

Library / Structural dynamics and vibration testing / SDY-51

Structural dynamics and vibration testing

Miles estimate of resonant RMS acceleration

Approximate RMS absolute acceleration of a lightly damped single-degree-of-freedom system on a base that vibrates with a broadband, locally flat acceleration PSD, from the natural frequency, the quality factor Q = 1/(2ζ) and the base PSD at that frequency.

Ref
SDY-51
Rev
v1
Field
Structural dynamics and vibration testing
Result
arms [m/s²]

The Miles equation estimates the RMS absolute acceleration of a lightly damped single-degree-of-freedom system on a base with a broadband, locally flat acceleration PSD: arms ≈ √[(π/2) fₙ Q Sb(fₙ)], with Q = 1/(2ζ). It is a resonance approximation that ignores the small contribution from the damping term in the numerator, so it is best for Q above about 10.

Approximate RMS absolute acceleration of a lightly damped single-degree-of-freedom system on a base that vibrates with a broadband, locally flat acceleration PSD, from the natural frequency, the quality factor Q = 1/(2ζ) and the base PSD at that frequency.

Calculator

Solve for
m/s²
Hz
52,000
1200
(m/s²)²/Hz
1e-41
  • Mean square, (π/2) fₙ Q Sb39.27 (m/s²)²
  • RMS in g0.639 g
  • Damping ratio, 1/(2Q)0.02

What drives the result

Each variable is moved across its typical range while the others stay at the values above. The longest bar is the key driver.

RMS acceleration (m/s²) current value 6.267 m/s²
SbBase acceleration PSD at fₙKey driver
0.44344.3
fnNatural frequency
1.9839.6
QQuality factor, 1/(2ζ)
1.2517.7
  • A resonance at 50 Hz with Q = 25 on a base PSD of 0.02 (m/s²)²/Hz responds with 6.267 m/s² RMS (0.639 g).
  • Doubling Q raises the response only by √2: a sharper resonance amplifies but not in proportion.
Chart data as tables

Ranked variables

VariableTypical rangeLowest resultHighest resultSwing (m/s²)Local stepChange in result
Sb Base acceleration PSD at fₙ1e-4 to 1 (m/s²)²/Hz0.443144.3143.87+10%+4.88 %
fn Natural frequency5 to 2,000 Hz1.98239.6337.65+10%+4.88 %
Q Quality factor, 1/(2ζ)1 to 200 1.25317.7216.47+10%+4.88 %

Sweep of Quality factor, 1/(2ζ)

Quality factor, 1/(2ζ)RMS acceleration (m/s²)
11.253
25.886.375
50.758.928
75.6310.9
100.512.56
125.414.03
150.315.36
175.116.59
20017.72

Sweep one variable

RMS acceleration (m/s²)Hover, touch, or use the arrow keys on the chart
051015 50100150200 Quality factor, 1/(2ζ) now 6.267

Variables and how each one contributes

arms

RMS acceleration

Result · m/s²

What the equation gives you. Everything else feeds it.

fn

Natural frequency

Hz · typical 5 to 2,000

The natural frequency of the resonance, in Hz. Raises the response with the square root of the frequency. Raising it by 10 % (to 55) moves the result by +4.88 %, from 6.267 to 6.572 m/s².

Q

Quality factor, 1/(2ζ)

· typical 1 to 200

The quality factor, 1/(2ζ), a plain number. A higher Q means a sharper resonance. Raises the response with the square root of Q. Raising it by 10 % (to 27.5) moves the result by +4.88 %, from 6.267 to 6.572 m/s².

Sb

Base acceleration PSD at fₙ

(m/s²)²/Hz · typical 1e-4 to 1

The base acceleration PSD at the natural frequency, in (m/s²)²/Hz, assumed flat nearby. Raises the response with the square root of the PSD. Raising it by 10 % (to 0.022) moves the result by +4.88 %, from 6.267 to 6.572 m/s².

Worked example with the values above

  1. Product: (π/2) × 50 × 25 × 0.02 = 39.27.
  2. Take the square root.
  3. arms = 6.2666 m/s².

Assumptions and limits

  • A linear, time-invariant system and a stationary random input, with spectra that are one-sided and in consistent units.
  • For the Miles estimate: a lightly damped single-degree-of-freedom system and a base PSD that is locally flat around the resonance.

Common mistakes

  • Mixing one-sided and two-sided spectra, which differ by a factor of 2.
  • Using the Miles equation for heavily damped systems or sharply varying input spectra.
  • Dividing by (2πf)⁴ at very low frequency, where drift and sensor noise dominate.
  • Treating RMS as a peak value: peaks in a Gaussian random signal are about three times larger.

Statistics and uncertainty

Spectral estimates carry random error that falls with the number of averages, and integrating them adds the errors of every band. Integrals are most sensitive to the frequencies where the spectrum is largest.

Where it is used

  • Qualification and fatigue assessment under random vibration specifications.
  • Estimating overall RMS, displacement and resonant response from measured or specified PSDs.

Maths you need

  • Power spectral density: power per unit frequency
  • Root mean square: the square root of the mean square
  • Quality factor: Q = 1/(2ζ), the resonance sharpness

Related formulas

Practise this formula