Library / Terramechanics and off-road mobility / TER-26
Terramechanics and off-road mobility
Limiting cone index, tracked vehicle
Cone index the soil must have for a tracked vehicle to keep moving, from its weight and track geometry.
- Ref
- TER-26
- Rev
- v1
- Field
- Terramechanics and off-road mobility
- Result
- CIL,track [kPa]
The lecture’s limiting cone index for a tracked vehicle is CIL = 1.63 W/(2n b ca √(pt d)), with n the number of stations or axles per side, so Nw = 2n. It is the cone index the soil must have for the vehicle to keep moving. The lecture’s symbol e for the link area ratio is written ca here, consistent with its worked example. These are empirical correlations, not guaranteed pass or fail predictions for every soil and pass count. W is the total weight in kN.
Cone index the soil must have for a tracked vehicle to keep moving, from its weight and track geometry. It is an empirical correlation, so it points to the likely outcome, not a guaranteed pass or fail.
Calculator
- Limiting cone index in psi57.16 psi
- Mean maximum pressure for the same vehicle (Nw = 2n)304.7 kPa
- Ratio CIL/MMP1.294
What drives the result
Each variable is moved across its typical range while the others stay at the values above. The longest bar is the key driver.
- The lecture vehicle needs a soil cone index of 394.1 kPa (57.16 psi). It is 1.63/1.26 = 1.294 times the MMP of 304.7 kPa, so CIL follows MMP in proportion.
- A soil with a remoulded cone index of 240 kPa, as in the remoulded cone index entry, falls short of 394.1 kPa. This is a go or no-go screening method, not a precise prediction.
Chart data as tables
Ranked variables
| Variable | Typical range | Lowest result | Highest result | Swing (kPa) | Local step | Change in result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n Road-wheel stations per side | 2 to 12 | 197.1 | 1,182 | 985.3 | +1 | −14.3 % |
| W Vehicle weight | 100 to 1,500 kN | 61.77 | 926.6 | 864.8 | +10% | +10 % |
| b Track width | 0.25 to 1 m | 236.5 | 945.9 | 709.4 | +10% | −9.09 % |
| ca Link area ratio | 0.5 to 1 | 370.5 | 740.9 | 370.5 | +10% | −9.09 % |
| d Road-wheel diameter | 0.3 to 1.2 m | 321.8 | 643.6 | 321.8 | +10% | −4.65 % |
| pt Track pitch | 0.08 to 0.3 m | 313.6 | 607.4 | 293.7 | +10% | −4.65 % |
Sweep of Vehicle weight
| Vehicle weight (kN) | Limiting cone index (kPa) |
|---|---|
| 100 | 61.77 |
| 275 | 169.9 |
| 450 | 278 |
| 625 | 386.1 |
| 800 | 494.2 |
| 975 | 602.3 |
| 1,150 | 710.4 |
| 1,325 | 818.5 |
| 1,500 | 926.6 |
Sweep one variable
Variables and how each one contributes
Limiting cone index
What the equation gives you. Everything else feeds it.
Vehicle weight
The total weight of the vehicle, in kN. Raises the limiting cone index in proportion. Raising it by 10 % (to 701.8) moves the result by +10 %, from 394.1 to 433.5 kPa.
Road-wheel stations per side
The number of road-wheel stations on each side, a whole number. Lowers the limiting cone index in inverse proportion. Raising it by 1 (to 7) moves the result by −14.3 %, from 394.1 to 337.8 kPa.
Track width
The width of each track, in m. Lowers the limiting cone index in inverse proportion. Raising it by 10 % (to 0.66) moves the result by −9.09 %, from 394.1 to 358.3 kPa.
Link area ratio
The link area ratio, between 0.5 and 1. Lowers the limiting cone index in inverse proportion. Raising it by 0.02 (to 0.96) moves the result by −2.08 %, from 394.1 to 385.9 kPa.
Track pitch
The track pitch, in m. Lowers the limiting cone index with the square root of the pitch. Raising it by 10 % (to 0.209) moves the result by −4.65 %, from 394.1 to 375.8 kPa.
Road-wheel diameter
The road-wheel diameter, in m. Lowers the limiting cone index with the square root of the diameter. Raising it by 10 % (to 0.88) moves the result by −4.65 %, from 394.1 to 375.8 kPa.
Worked example with the values above
- Numerator: 1.63 W = 1.63 × 638 = 1,040 kN.
- Denominator: 2n b ca √(ptd) = 12 × 0.6 × 0.94 × √(0.19 × 0.8) = 2.639.
- CIL = 394.1 kPa.
Assumptions and limits
- A tracked vehicle on fine-grained soil, with the lecture’s correlation constant 1.63.
- Consistent units: kN and m give kPa.
Common mistakes
- Using the total station count in place of the per-side count n.
- Comparing a result in kPa against a soil strength in psi.
Statistics and uncertainty
Like MMP, the limiting cone index is an empirical correlation; treat results within ±10 % as equal. Soil moisture, pass count and slope change the real limit, so use the result as a screen.
Where it is used
- Comparing the soil strength a vehicle needs with that measured on the route.
- Screening vehicle options for a soft-ground route.
Maths you need
- Cone index: penetrometer resistance of soil
- Mean maximum pressure: peak pressure under road wheels