Your Equation

Library / Solution chemistry, equilibria and kinetics / SCH-45

Solution chemistry, equilibria and kinetics

Initial rate with a competitive inhibitor

Initial rate with a reversible competitive inhibitor at free concentration I and binding constant Ki, which raises the apparent Km but leaves Vmax unchanged.

Ref
SCH-45
Rev
v1
Field
Solution chemistry, equilibria and kinetics
Result
vi [mol/(L·s)]

A competitive inhibitor binds to the same site as the substrate, so it raises the apparent Michaelis constant by the factor 1 + I/Ki and leaves Vmax unchanged: vi = Vmax S/[Km(1 + I/Ki) + S]. Enough substrate can outcompete the inhibitor and return the rate to Vmax. I must be the free inhibitor concentration, which can differ from the total when the inhibitor binds tightly. At I = 0 the formula reduces to the uninhibited rate.

Initial rate with a reversible competitive inhibitor at free concentration I and binding constant Ki, which raises the apparent Km but leaves Vmax unchanged. At I = 0 it becomes the uninhibited Michaelis–Menten rate.

Calculator

Solve for
mol/(L·s)
mol/(L·s)
1e-810
mol/L
1e-61
mol/L
1e-61
mol/L
01
mol/L
1e-81
  • Uninhibited rate, Vmax S/(Km + S)0.0015 mol/(L·s)
  • Apparent Km, Km(1 + I/Ki)0.003 mol/L
  • Inhibition, 100(1 − vi/v₀)33.33 %

What drives the result

Each variable is moved across its typical range while the others stay at the values above. The longest bar is the key driver.

Inhibited rate (mol/(L·s)) current value 0.001 mol/(L·s)
VmaxMaximum rateKey driver
5e-95
KmMichaelis constant
2e-60.002
SSubstrate concentration
6.66e-70.00199
KiInhibitor binding constant
3e-80.0015
IFree inhibitor concentration
5.98e-60.0015
  • The inhibitor slows the reaction from 0.0015 to 0.001 mol/(L·s), 33.3 % inhibition, by raising Km to 0.003 mol/L.
  • Raising the substrate concentration reduces the inhibition, which distinguishes competitive inhibition from the non-competitive kind, where Vmax itself falls.
Chart data as tables

Ranked variables

VariableTypical rangeLowest resultHighest resultSwing (mol/(L·s))Local stepChange in result
Vmax Maximum rate1e-8 to 10 mol/(L·s)5e-955+10%+10 %
Km Michaelis constant1e-6 to 1 mol/L1.998e-60.0019980.001996+10%−4.76 %
S Substrate concentration1e-6 to 1 mol/L6.664e-70.0019940.001993+10%+4.76 %
Ki Inhibitor binding constant1e-8 to 1 mol/L3e-80.0014990.001499+10%+3.13 %
I Free inhibitor concentration0 to 1 mol/L5.976e-60.00150.001494+10%−3.23 %

Sweep of Free inhibitor concentration

Free inhibitor concentration (mol/L)Inhibited rate (mol/(L·s))
00.0015
0.1254.651e-5
0.252.362e-5
0.3751.583e-5
0.51.19e-5
0.6259.539e-6
0.757.958e-6
0.8756.826e-6
15.976e-6

Sweep one variable

Inhibited rate (mol/(L·s))Hover, touch, or use the arrow keys on the chart
05e−40.0010.0015 00.20.40.60.81 Free inhibitor concentration (mol/L) now 0.001

Variables and how each one contributes

vi

Inhibited rate

Result · mol/(L·s)

What the equation gives you. Everything else feeds it.

Vmax

Maximum rate

mol/(L·s) · typical 1e-8 to 10

The maximum rate, in mol/(L·s). Raises the rate in direct proportion. Raising it by 10 % (to 0.0022) moves the result by +10 %, from 0.001 to 0.0011 mol/(L·s).

S

Substrate concentration

mol/L · typical 1e-6 to 1

The substrate concentration, in mol/L. Raises the rate, and overcomes more of the inhibition. Raising it by 10 % (to 0.0033) moves the result by +4.76 %, from 0.001 to 0.001048 mol/(L·s).

Km

Michaelis constant

mol/L · typical 1e-6 to 1

The Michaelis constant without inhibitor, in mol/L. A larger Km lowers the rate. Raising it by 10 % (to 0.0011) moves the result by −4.76 %, from 0.001 to 9.524×10−4 mol/(L·s).

I

Free inhibitor concentration

mol/L · typical 0 to 1

The free inhibitor concentration, in mol/L. A larger inhibitor concentration lowers the rate. Raising it by 10 % (to 0.0022) moves the result by −3.23 %, from 0.001 to 9.677×10−4 mol/(L·s).

Ki

Inhibitor binding constant

mol/L · typical 1e-8 to 1

The inhibitor binding constant, in mol/L. A larger Ki means weaker inhibition, so the rate rises. Raising it by 10 % (to 0.0011) moves the result by +3.13 %, from 0.001 to 0.001031 mol/(L·s).

Worked example with the values above

  1. Apparent Km: Km(1 + I/Ki) = 0.001 × (1 + 0.002/0.001) = 0.003 mol/L.
  2. Denominator: 0.003 + 0.003 = 0.006.
  3. vi = 0.002 × 0.003 / 0.006 = 0.001 mol/(L·s).

Assumptions and limits

  • Irreversible first-order steps for the consecutive scheme, and a single substrate with a steady-state intermediate for the enzyme.
  • Constant temperature, pH and volume, with negligible product and substrate depletion for initial rates.

Common mistakes

  • Using the formulas after substantial substrate depletion, where the rate no longer is the initial rate.
  • Mixing up k₁ and k₂ in the consecutive formulas.
  • Using the total inhibitor concentration in place of the free one.

Statistics and uncertainty

Fitted enzyme constants, Km and Vmax, carry uncertainties of 10 % to 30 % from the data scatter, and a wide range of substrate concentrations is needed to define both.

Where it is used

  • Following intermediates in sequential reactions and decay chains.
  • Describing enzyme saturation and inhibition.

Maths you need

  • Integrated rate law: concentration as a function of time
  • Steady state: the intermediate’s concentration stays constant
  • Michaelis constant: Km, the substrate concentration at half of Vmax

Related formulas

Practise this formula