Your Equation

Library / Structural dynamics and vibration testing / SDY-22

Structural dynamics and vibration testing

Generalised modal stiffness

Modal (generalised) stiffness of a shape φ for a two-coordinate model: the shape multiplied through the stiffness matrix K on both sides.

Ref
SDY-22
Rev
v1
Field
Structural dynamics and vibration testing
Result
kr [N/m]

The modal stiffness kr = φᵀKφ is the stiffness that the mode behaves as. Divided by the modal mass of the same shape it gives the square of the natural angular frequency: ω² = kᵣ/mᵣ. For an assumed shape this is the Rayleigh quotient, an upper bound on the lowest frequency.

Modal (generalised) stiffness of a shape φ for a two-coordinate model: the shape multiplied through the stiffness matrix K on both sides. Divided by the modal mass it gives the squared natural frequency.

Calculator

Solve for
N/m
−33
−33
N/m
0.150
N/m
−1010
N/m
0.150
  • Sum of the diagonal stiffnesses10 N/m
  • Modal stiffness if the shape is doubled56 N/m
  • Strain energy for a unit modal coordinate, ½kᵣ7 J

What drives the result

Each variable is moved across its typical range while the others stay at the values above. The longest bar is the key driver.

Modal stiffness (N/m) current value 14 N/m
K22Stiffness matrix entry 22Key driver
−1.6198
φ1Mode shape ordinate 1
13.494
K12Stiffness matrix entry 12
−1862
K11Stiffness matrix entry 11
8.158
φ2Mode shape ordinate 2
5.0454
  • The shape (1, 2) gives a modal stiffness of 14 N/m.
  • With the modal mass of the same shape, ω = √(kᵣ/mᵣ) gives a frequency estimate that is never below the true fundamental.
Chart data as tables

Ranked variables

VariableTypical rangeLowest resultHighest resultSwing (N/m)Local stepChange in result
K22 Stiffness matrix entry 220.1 to 50 N/m−1.6198199.6+10%+11.4 %
φ1 Mode shape ordinate 1−3 to 3 13.369480.64+0.12 +4.05 %
K12 Stiffness matrix entry 12−10 to 10 N/m−186280+0.4 N/m+11.4 %
K11 Stiffness matrix entry 110.1 to 50 N/m8.15849.9+10%+4.29 %
φ2 Mode shape ordinate 2−3 to 3 5.045448.96+0.12 +10.7 %

Sweep of Mode shape ordinate 1

Mode shape ordinate 1Modal stiffness (N/m)
−394
−2.2564.38
−1.541.5
−0.7525.38
016
0.7513.38
1.517.5
2.2528.38
346

Sweep one variable

Modal stiffness (N/m)Hover, touch, or use the arrow keys on the chart
20406080100 −3−2−10123 Mode shape ordinate 1 now 14

Variables and how each one contributes

kr

Modal stiffness

Result · N/m

What the equation gives you. Everything else feeds it.

φ1

Mode shape ordinate 1

· typical −3 to 3

The mode shape ordinate at coordinate 1 (dimensionless). Only the ratio v₁ : v₂ defines the shape; the scale is arbitrary. Enters squared in the quadratic forms. Raising it by 0.1 (to 1.1) moves the result by +3.29 %, from 14 to 14.46 N/m.

φ2

Mode shape ordinate 2

· typical −3 to 3

The mode shape ordinate at coordinate 2 (dimensionless). Enters squared in the quadratic forms. Raising it by 0.1 (to 2.1) moves the result by +8.86 %, from 14 to 15.24 N/m.

K11

Stiffness matrix entry 11

N/m · typical 0.1 to 50

The stiffness matrix entry for coordinate 1, in N/m. Raises the modal stiffness. Raising it by 10 % (to 6.6) moves the result by +4.29 %, from 14 to 14.6 N/m.

K12

Stiffness matrix entry 12

N/m · typical −10 to 10

The off-diagonal stiffness entry, in N/m: negative for a spring linking the two coordinates. Couples the two coordinates. Raising it by 0.5 (to −1.5) moves the result by +14.3 %, from 14 to 16 N/m.

K22

Stiffness matrix entry 22

N/m · typical 0.1 to 50

The stiffness matrix entry for coordinate 2, in N/m. Raises the modal stiffness. Raising it by 10 % (to 4.4) moves the result by +11.4 %, from 14 to 15.6 N/m.

Worked example with the values above

  1. Expand: φ₁²K₁₁ + 2φ₁φ₂K₁₂ + φ₂²K₂₂.
  2. Substitute: 1 × 6 + 4 × −2 + 4 × 4.
  3. kᵣ = 14 N/m.

Assumptions and limits

  • A small, linear model with symmetric mass and stiffness matrices; this entry shows the arithmetic with two (or three) coordinates.
  • Shape, mass and stiffness are in consistent units and degree-of-freedom order.

Common mistakes

  • Using a shape scaled in one program with a modal mass from another that uses a different normalisation.
  • Mixing the order of the degrees of freedom in the shape and in the matrix.
  • Forgetting that modal mass depends on how the shape is scaled, while the participation and effective masses do not.

Statistics and uncertainty

These are exact algebraic forms, so their uncertainty comes from the inputs: mass and stiffness matrices from a model, and mode shapes from a modal solution or test. Shape errors at a few points can shift modal quantities noticeably.

Where it is used

  • Modal analysis, model reduction and checks that a reduced model has kept enough modes.
  • Base-shock and seismic analysis through participation factors and effective modal masses.

Maths you need

  • Mass and stiffness matrices: the matrices of M ü + K u = F
  • Mode shape: the pattern of motion at one natural frequency
  • Quadratic form: vᵀMv, a scalar from a vector and a matrix

Related formulas

Practise this formula